![]() ![]() In summary, if you liked the first one, I certainly wouldn't discourage you from seeing NYSM2. It's the kind of film where you can laugh off the issues and appreciate the fun parts. Sure I found myself thinking of several occasions 'my god this is garbage', but it didn't annoy me. It's light-hearted fun, which isn't really tackling any of the world's serious topics and as a spectacle is still great. ![]() So how the hell, given all these problems, does it give it get a 6 I hear you cry? Well, as with the first, it is still thoroughly entertaining. Moreover his acting in this was reminiscent of all his appalling, wooden performances from the early Harry Potter films And just I was starting to believe that maybe he could act! And then there are issues around plot holes, speech which is purely for the viewers' benefit, seemingly irrelevant sub-plots and a ridiculously backwards ending which doesn't appear to make much sense. I don't want to give anything away but he is such a stereotypical, spoilt, British man it's untrue. And talking of characters – Daniel Radcliffe's character is atrocious. I get the feeling it might have been easier for her just to play Isla Fisher's character (Katie Holmes-Maggie Gyllenhaal in Batman style) rather than trying to shoehorn in a different character. Yet her replacement (played by Lizzy Caplan) is not only treated as if she's been there since the beginning, but also held responsible for all the actions she wasn't around for in the first film. Then there's the fact that Isla Fisher's character has left the gang and although briefly explained at the beginning of the film, is never mentioned again. ![]() The script in itself is a problem it's messy, incongruent and forced – "well we need to have a shootout/car chase, otherwise it won't be cool enough". In fact inconsistent or unlikely character motivations and actions are a problem throughout the film (with supporting characters as well as the leads).Then there's the fact that this plot is so unrealistic and beyond the realms of possibility that it makes the first script look practically normal. However, unlike the first, their motivations behind each of these stunts are a little less clear and certainly less meaningful. On practically every level it falls down Now You See Me 2 picks up directly where the first film left off and the film follows a similar pattern – The 4 (or 5?) horsemen, performing larger-than-life magic with the aim of providing for those less fortunate or exposing those who do wrong. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |